中医杂志

在梳理中医辨伪历史脉络的基础上，总结各阶段的辨伪成就，分析辨伪方法的演进特点。中医古籍文献辨伪工作肇始于隋唐，发展于宋元，至明清及近现代已较为成熟。宋以前辨伪以零散质疑为主，两宋金元时期在疑经思潮下已开始综合性地运用辨伪方法；明清时期，在辨伪方法、辨伪书目上，古籍文献辨伪工作都取得了进一步发展，以《四库全书总目提要》《医学读书志》《世补斋医书》《中国医籍考》等最为突出；民国时期“古史辨”运动兴起，文献辨伪成为时代学术热点，以谢观所著《中国医学源流论》《中国医籍大辞典》为代表；当代谢仲墨的《历代医书丛考》为首部且唯一一部辨伪专书，意义重大，而其他辨伪成果以学术论文的形式被不断发表。中医古籍文献辨伪应当深入考察、实事求是、谨慎判断，以期正本清源，去伪存真。

Based on review of the historical development of textual criticism in traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), this paper summarizes achievements in different periods and analyzes the evolution of critical methods. The work of identifying spurious texts in TCM literature began in the Sui and Tang dynasties, developed further during the Song and Yuan, and reached a relatively mature state in the Ming, Qing and modern periods. Before the Song dynasty, criticism was mostly scattered skepticism. During the Song, Jin, and Yuan dynasties, under the intellectual trend of questioning classical canons, more comprehensive methods of textual criticism were applied. During the Ming and Qing dynasties, significant progress was made both in methodology and bibliographic studies, with The General Catalogue of the Complete Library in Four Branches of Literature （《四库全书总目提要》）, Medical Reading Notes （《医学读书志》）, Shibu Zhai Medical Books （《世补斋医书》）, and Studies of China's Medical Books （《中国医籍考》） as prominent examples. In the Republican era, the "Doubting Antiquity" movement brought textual criticism to the forefront of academic debate, represented by XIE Guan's Treatises on Origins and Developments of Traditional Chinese Medicine （《中国医学源流论》） and The Great Dictionary of Chinese Medical Books （《中国医籍大辞典》）. In contemporary period, XIE Zhongmo's Collected Studies on Medical Books Through the Ages （《历代医书丛考》） stands as the first and only monograph dedicated specifically to authentication of medical texts, holding significant importance. While other verification findings mainly appear in academic papers. Textual criticism of TCM literature demands thorough investigation, objectivity, and cautious judgment, aiming to rectify the sources, eliminate forgeries, and preserve authentic knowledge.