nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 17, v.67 1868-1876
益肺灸不同灸量组合治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者的疗效差异分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家卫生健康委医药卫生科技发展研究中心关于癌症、心脑血管、呼吸和代谢性疾病防治研究国家科技重大专项(2023ZD0506700,2023ZD0506703); 河南省中医药科学研究专项(2024ZYZD04); 河南省卫生健康委员会河南省医学科学院“三个100”计划(HNCRD202435); 河南省中医学“双一流”创建科学研究专项(HSRP-DFCTCM-2023-3-16)
邮箱(Email): lisuyun2000@126.com;
DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2026.17.011
发布时间: 2026-09-01
出版时间: 2026-09-01
移动端阅读
摘要:

目的 比较益肺灸不同灸量组合治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(简称慢阻肺)稳定期的临床疗效及安全性。方法 选取240例慢阻肺稳定期肺气虚证/肺脾气虚证/肺肾气虚证患者为研究对象,均给予西医规范治疗和益肺灸治疗。根据艾绒、姜泥厚度及治疗时间随机分为8组,A组:3.0 cm厚度艾绒,2.5 cm姜泥,60 min治疗时间;B组:3.0 cm厚度艾绒,2.5 cm姜泥,90 min治疗时间;C组:2.0 cm厚度艾绒,2.5 cm姜泥,60 min治疗时间;D组:2.0 cm厚度艾绒,2.5 cm姜泥,90 min治疗时间;E组:3.0 cm厚度艾绒,2.0 cm姜泥,60 min治疗时间;F组:3.0 cm厚度艾绒,2.0 cm姜泥,90 min治疗时间;G组:2.0 cm厚度艾绒,2.0 cm姜泥,60 min治疗时间;H组:2.0 cm厚度艾绒,2.0 cm姜泥,90 min治疗时间。各组均15天治疗1次,治疗3个月,共6次。主要结局指标是治疗前后慢阻肺稳定期临床症状和体征问卷评分(包括咳嗽、咳痰、喘息、胸闷、气短、乏力、紫绀7个症状评分及总分)。次要结局指标包括治疗前后慢阻肺患者报告结局量表修订版(mCOPD-PRO)评分(包括生理、心理、环境3个领域评分及总分),疗效满意度问卷修订版(mESQ-COPD)评分(包括临床症状、工作生活能力、环境适应能力、治疗效果评分及总分);治疗过程中灸感评分(包括热感情况评分、特殊感觉强度评分)及达到的最高温度、≥43℃维持时间、达到43℃所需时间。治疗后进行安全性评价。结果 研究过程中脱落18例,最终纳入符合方案集的患者222例(A组27例、B组28例、C组28例、D组29例、E组27例、F组28例、G组27例、H组28例)进行结果分析。治疗后F组在临床症状和体征问卷总评分及咳嗽、胸闷评分均低于其他各组(P<0.05)。治疗后F组mCOPD-PRO总分及生理领域评分较其他各组降低(P<0.05);F组mESQ-COPD总分及临床症状、治疗效果评分较其他各组降低(P<0.05);F组热感情况评分显著高于其他各组(P<0.05);治疗后E组和F组最高温度显著高于其他各组,F组≥43℃维持时间显著长于其他各组,E组和F组达到43℃所需时间显著少于C组、D组、G组、H组(P<0.05)。各组患者治疗前后血常规、肝功能、肾功能、尿常规、心电图未见明显异常,治疗期间未出现严重不良事件。结论 不同灸量组合益肺灸治疗慢阻肺稳定期疗效存在差异,其中3.0 cm厚度艾绒、2.0 cm姜泥、90 min治疗时间的灸量组合可获得相对更佳的疗效,且安全性好。

Abstract:

Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of lung-boosting moxibustion with different moxibustion doses in the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD).Methods A total of 240 stable COPD patients with lung qi deficiency,lung-spleen qi deficiency,or lung-kidney qi deficiency syndrome were enrolled,all receiving standardized western medical treatment and lung-boosting moxibustion.According to the thickness of the moxa wool,the thickness of the ginger paste,and the treatment duration,patients were randomly divided into eight groups,which were Group A(3.0 cm thickness moxa,2.5 cm ginger mud,60 min treatment time),Group B(3.0 cm thickness moxa,2.5 cm ginger mud,90 min treatment time),Group C(2.0 cm thickness moxa,2.5 cm ginger mud,60 min treatment time),Group D(2.0 cm thickness moxa,2.5 cm ginger mud,90 min treatment time),Group E(3.0 cm thickness moxa,2.0 cm ginger mud,60 min treatment time),Group F(3.0 cm thickness moxa,2.0 cm ginger mud,90 min treatment time),Group G(2.0 cm thickness moxa,2.0 cm ginger mud,60 min treatment time),Group H(2.0 cm thickness moxa,2.0 cm ginger mud,90 min treatment time).Treatment was performed once every 15 days for 3 months,with a total of six sessions.The primary outcomes were the scores of the clinical symptoms and signs questionnaire for stable COPD before and after treatment,comprising seven symptom domains(cough,sputum production,wheezing,chest tightness,shortness of breath,fatigue,and cyanosis) and the total score.The secondary outcomes included the scores of the modified COPD patient-reported outcome questionnaire(mCOPD-PRO) involving the physical,psychological,and environmental domains and the total score,the scores of the modified Effectiveness Satisfaction Questionnaire for COPD(mESQ-COPD) involving clinical symptoms,work and daily living capacity,environmental adaptability,treatment efficacy,and the total score before and after treatment,the moxibustion sensation scores(heat sensation score and special sensation intensity score) during treatment,and cutaneous temperature(the maximum temperature achieved,the duration of temperature maintained at ≥43 ℃,and the time required to reach 43 ℃).The safety evaluation was carried out after treatment.Results During the study,18 patients withdrew,and 222 patients were included in the per-protocol set for analysis,including 27 in Group A,28 in Group B,28 in Group C,29 in Group D,27 in Group E,28 in Group F,27 in Group G,and 28 in Group H.After treatment,the total score on the clinical symptoms and signs questionnaire,as well as the cough and chest tightness symptom scores in Group F were significantly lower than those in other groups(P<0.05).Group F demonstrated statistically lower total mCOPD-PRO score and physical domain score(P<0.05),lower total mESQ-COPD score and the scores for clinical symptoms and treatment efficacy(P < 0.05),as well as higher heat sensation score(P<0.05) than other groups.The maximum temperature was significantly higher in Group E and Group F than in the other groups,while the duration of temperature maintained at ≥43 ℃ was significantly longer in Group F than other groups,and the time required to reach 43 ℃ was significantly shorter in Group E and Group F than in Groups C,D,G,and H(P<0.05).No significant abnormalities were observed in routine blood tests,liver function,renal function,urinalysis,or electrocardiograms before and after treatment in any group.No serious adverse events occurred during the treatment period.Conclusion There are differences in the efficacy of different moxibustion doses of lung-boosting moxibustion in the treatment of stable COPD.Moxibustion with 3.0 cm thickness moxa,2.0 cm ginger mud,and 90 min treatment time can obtain relatively superior efficacy while demonstrating a favorable safety profile.

参考文献

[1]Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(2026report)[EB/OL].(2025-11-11)[2025-12-01]. https://goldcopd. org/2026-gold-reports/.

[2]Xu J, Ji Z, Zhang P, et al. Disease burden of COPD in the Chinese population:a systematic review[J/OL]. Ther Adv Respir Dis, 2023, 17:17534666231218899. https://pubmed. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/38146618/.

[3]谢永霞,王佳佳,冯贞贞,等. 2011—2022年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期证候学研究述评[J].中医杂志,2023,64(23):2382-2387.

[4]王湘雨,王洋,李婷婷.益肺灸辅助治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床研究[J].新中医,2021, 53(16):151-154.

[5]林晓红,王明航,杨江,等.益肺灸治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床疗效的文献评价和Meta分析[J].中国老年学杂志,2023, 43(12):2865-2871.

[6]王明航,李素云,史阳琳,等.益肺灸治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病关键技术专家问卷调查分析[J].中医学报,2019, 34(8):1778-1782.

[7]林晓红,时新萍,王明航,等.益肺灸灸治时长对慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床疗效的优化研究及适宜性评价[J].中国全科医学,2022, 25(33):4145-4152.

[8]Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(2023report)[EB/OL].(2022-11-15)[2025-12-01]. https://goldcopd. org/2023-gold-reports/.

[9]中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组,中国医师协会呼吸医师分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病工作委员会.慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2021年修订版)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2021, 44(3):170-205.

[10]中华中医药学会内科分会肺系病专业委员会.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中医证候诊断标准(2011版)[J].中医杂志,2012, 53(2):177-178.

[11]张颖,王俊慧,胡烨胤,等.中医药临床研究中预试验样本量的确定[J].中医杂志,2021, 62(4):307-311.

[12]王明航,谢洋,李建生,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期临床症状测评问卷信度、效度和反应度考核[J].中医杂志,2015, 56(10):831-835.

[13]Li J, Wang J, Xie Y, et al. Development and validation of the modified patient-reported outcome scale for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(mCOPD-PRO)[J/OL].Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2020, 15:661-669.https://pubmed. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/32273695/.

[14]李建生,谢洋,王佳佳,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者疗效满意度问卷修订版研制与评价[J].中国全科医学,2022, 25(22):2796-2803.

[15]潘政绮.改良长蛇灸灸感量表的修订及其应用研究[D].成都:成都中医药大学,2021:79-80.

[16]Lopez A D. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:current burden and future projections[J]. Eur Respir J,2006, 27(2):397-412.

[17]王明航,谢洋,史阳琳,等.益肺灸对慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者生存质量和疗效满意度的影响多中心随机对照研究[J].中医杂志,2019, 60(14):1202-1208.

[18]唐娅妮,崔艺敏,何轶帆,等.艾灸热、光、烟作用机制研究进展[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2022, 29(11):148-151.

[19]杨秀娟,王佳佳,郭晶晶,等.生姜、干姜、炮姜的性效考证及其化学成分、药理活性的研究进展[J].中药新药与临床药理,2024,35(4):595-605.

[20]中华中医药学会内科分会肺系病专业委员会.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中医诊疗指南(2011版)[J].中医杂志,2012, 53(1):80-84.

[21]代欣玥,訾明杰,杨巧宁,等.基于文献的中医药临床研究结局指标现状分析及思考[J].中医杂志,2022, 63(12):1122-1127.

[22]赵琼,张俊龙,郭蕾.浅述生存质量测评与评价在中医药领域中的应用[J].中医杂志,2010, 51(11):1038-1040.

[23]韩超,尹洪娜,孙忠人,等.影响艾灸疗效的因素分析[J].针灸临床杂志,2020, 36(4):1-4.

[24]季辉,王玲玲,周攀,等.不同灸温对急性佐剂性关节炎大鼠血清IL-1β、IL-2及TNF-α含量的影响[J].上海针灸杂志,2015, 34(7):597-599.

[25]朱兵.关于灸材和灸温的思考[J].针刺研究,2018,43(2):63-67.

[26]吉紫乐.基于人体表面温度实时监测系统的慢阻肺益肺灸不同治疗时间与艾绒厚度的效果评价研究[D].郑州:河南中医药大学,2023:38-39.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2026.17.011

中图分类号:R246.1

引用信息:

[1]许家昕,吉紫乐,张彭,等.益肺灸不同灸量组合治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者的疗效差异分析[J].中医杂志,2026,67(17):1868-1876.DOI:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2026.17.011.

基金信息:

国家卫生健康委医药卫生科技发展研究中心关于癌症、心脑血管、呼吸和代谢性疾病防治研究国家科技重大专项(2023ZD0506700,2023ZD0506703); 河南省中医药科学研究专项(2024ZYZD04); 河南省卫生健康委员会河南省医学科学院“三个100”计划(HNCRD202435); 河南省中医学“双一流”创建科学研究专项(HSRP-DFCTCM-2023-3-16)

发布时间:

2026-09-01

出版时间:

2026-09-01

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文